<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>International Biological and Biomedical Journal</title>
<title_fa></title_fa>
<short_title>IBBJ</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ibbj.org</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2423-4478</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online></journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>2423</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1399</year>
	<month>8</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2020</year>
	<month>11</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>6</volume>
<number>4</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Anesthesia for leg amputation in high risk patients: Case reports</title>
	<subject_fa>Clinical Medicine</subject_fa>
	<subject>Clinical Medicine</subject>
	<content_type_fa>Case Series</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Case Series</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>Background: High risk cases of leg amputation were one of major concerns in anesthesiologists.　&lt;br&gt;
Cases: Sixteen cases with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) 3 or 4 for leg amputation were reported.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Fifteen patients were medicated with more than two anticoagulants and 11 patients had bleeding tendency.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Thirteen patients received below knee amputation (BKA) and three patients received above knee amputation (AKA).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Twelve patients received sciatic and femoral nerve blocks using ropivacaine and lidocaine then intravenous fentanyl and/or midazolam, and four received general anesthesia with inhalation anesthetics.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Vasopressors were administered in 3/12 patients anesthetized by blocks and all patients by general anesthesia.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Heart rate increased to more than 120 beats/min during surgery in all cases in general anesthesia.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;VAS scores in postoperative 12 hours after surgery was 0 to 3 in patients anesthetized with blocks and 4 to 7 in patients with general anesthesia.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Phantom pain might be less in blocks.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Conclusions: Femoral and sciatic nerve blocks with small dose of fentanyl and/or midazolam seemed to be better than general anesthesia in terms of hemodynamics during surgery and postoperative analgesia.</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>lower leg, amputation, femoral nerve block, sciatic nerve block, general anesthesia</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ibbj.org/browse.php?a_code=A-10-353-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Tomoki</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Nishiyama</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>nishit-tky@umin.ac.jp</email>
	<code>10031947532846003723</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846003723</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Maruyama Memorial General  Hospital</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
